Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-05-09

SHREE RAM URBAN INFRAS.LD.FORML.S.R.MILL vs COURT RECEIVER,HIGH COURT OF MUMBAI

Citation / case number
SC 2010/33503
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHREE RAM URBAN INFRAS.LD.FORML.S.R.MILL
Respondent
COURT RECEIVER,HIGH COURT OF MUMBAI
Author
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Bench
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's civil revision application, affirming the authority of the Court Receiver appointed under Order XL, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to manage the tenanted property. The Court ruled that the Receiver had the right to issue eviction notices and that the appellant's arguments regarding the lack of leave to file the suit and defects in the notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act were without merit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision.

SHREE RAM URBAN INFRAS.LD.FORML.S.R.MILL vs COURT RECEIVER,HIGH COURT OF MUMBAI · Niyam