Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-05-06

Satya Pal Anand vs State Of M.P. And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 2361
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satya Pal Anand
Respondent
State Of M.P. And Anr
Author
A.K.Sikri
Bench
A.K.Sikri, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a Writ Petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 and Section 77 of the M.P. State Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, asserting that the provisions allowing the appointment of non-lawyers to quasi-judicial roles do not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court found that the appointments are under the supervision of a judicial officer and the High Court's oversight under Article 227 ensures accountability. The petitioner's claims of personal interest were also noted, impacting the maintainability of the PIL.

Satya Pal Anand vs State Of M.P. And Anr · Niyam