Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-03-12

SUDIPTA LENKA vs THE STATE OF ODISHA

Citation / case number
SC 2013/35982
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUDIPTA LENKA
Respondent
THE STATE OF ODISHA
Author
RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
P SATHASIVAM,RANJAN GOGOI,N.V. RAMANA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a writ petition under Article 32, emphasized the violation of fundamental rights under Article 21 due to the inaction of authorities in a case involving the tragic death of Itishree Pradhan, who was a victim of sexual harassment and subsequently set ablaze. The Court held that the State has a constitutional duty to protect its citizens and ensure timely action in cases of harassment, thereby directing the transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for a fair inquiry. The judgment underscores the necessity for accountability in law enforcement and the protection of women's rights.

SUDIPTA LENKA vs THE STATE OF ODISHA · Niyam