Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-03-26

EXEC.DIRECTOR STEEL AUTH.OF INDIA vs TYCOON TRADERS .

Citation / case number
SC 2012/11796
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
EXEC.DIRECTOR STEEL AUTH.OF INDIA
Respondent
TYCOON TRADERS .
Author
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Bench
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE GYAN SUDHA MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the contract between Steel Authority of India (SAIL) and Tycoon Traders was frustrated due to the refusal of permission to transport iron ore through Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, as per Section 38(v) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The Court affirmed that in cases of frustration, parties must be restored to their original positions, thus SAIL was directed to refund the entire amount received from the respondent. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the High Court's order for refund.

EXEC.DIRECTOR STEEL AUTH.OF INDIA vs TYCOON TRADERS . · Niyam