Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-03-03

U.O.I vs M/S. Concrete Products & Const. Co. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1914
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.O.I
Respondent
M/S. Concrete Products & Const. Co. Etc
Bench
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Surinder Singh

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to refer the dispute regarding recovery of excess payments under the escalation clause for HTS wires to arbitration, emphasizing that the arbitration clause in the contract was binding. The Court noted that the agreements stipulated that disputes arising from the contracts should be resolved through arbitration, thereby affirming the principle that parties must adhere to their contractual obligations. The appeals by the Union of India were dismissed, reinforcing the enforceability of arbitration agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

U.O.I vs M/S. Concrete Products & Const. Co. Etc · Niyam