Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-03-27

Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1745
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sundeep Kumar Bafna
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Vikramajit Sen
Bench
Vikramajit Sen, K.S.Radhakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction in granting regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), emphasizing that a person seeking bail must be in the custody of the Magistrate as per Section 167 CrPC. The Court held that the High Court cannot grant bail if the accused is not in custody, and the Magistrate's powers are limited once a case is committed to Sessions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that the application for bail was not maintainable due to the absence of custody.

Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam