Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-03-31

State Of Bihar & Ors vs Rajmangal Ram

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1674
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Bihar & Ors
Respondent
Rajmangal Ram
Author
Ranjan Gogoi
Bench
Ranjan Gogoi, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether High Courts can interfere with criminal prosecutions based on defects in the sanction to prosecute public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court emphasized that the requirement for sanction serves as a safeguard against frivolous prosecutions and must be scrutinized to ensure that the actions of public servants are connected to their official duties. The Court ultimately held that the High Court's interference in the criminal proceedings was unwarranted, thereby reinstating the validity of the prosecution sanction granted by the appropriate authority.

State Of Bihar & Ors vs Rajmangal Ram · Niyam