H.C. Of Judicature At Patna Thr. R.G vs Shyam Deo Singh & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the decision to deny extension of service to a judicial officer beyond the age of 58 must be based on the individual's service record rather than comparative assessments with other officers. The Court found that the adverse remarks in the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of the respondent were not communicated and were unsubstantiated, thus invalidating the basis for the denial of extension. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the administrative orders, emphasizing the importance of fair evaluation in service matters under Article 226 of the Constitution.