Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-06-30

BAL MANOHAR JALAN vs SUNIL PASWAN

Citation / case number
SC 2011/21876
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BAL MANOHAR JALAN
Respondent
SUNIL PASWAN
Author
C. NAGAPPAN
Bench
C NAGAPPAN T.S. THAKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's order under Section 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which remanded a case to treat a protest-cum-complaint petition as a complaint, violated the appellant's right to be heard as mandated by Section 401(2). The Court emphasized that no order detrimental to the accused can be made without providing an opportunity for defense. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and restored the decision of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, thereby upholding the rights of the accused.

BAL MANOHAR JALAN vs SUNIL PASWAN · Niyam