Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-10

KANTA vs TAGORE HEART CARE & RES.CEN.P.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2011/27991
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KANTA
Respondent
TAGORE HEART CARE & RES.CEN.P.LTD.
Author
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD
Bench
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's decision to set aside the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order granting compensation under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was erroneous. The Court emphasized the need for medical professionals to adhere to the standard of care expected in their field, particularly in cases involving consent and patient welfare. The appeal was allowed, reinstating the compensation awarded to the complainant, Mrs. Kanta, for medical negligence.

KANTA vs TAGORE HEART CARE & RES.CEN.P.LTD. · Niyam