Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-07

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs PRITAM SINGH BEDI .

Citation / case number
SC 2009/6923
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE BANK OF PATIALA
Respondent
PRITAM SINGH BEDI .
Author
Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Bench
V. GOPALA GOWDA SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, affirming that employees who retired under the State Bank of Patiala Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2000, and had completed over 19.5 years of service are entitled to pension under Regulation 28 of the State Bank of Patiala (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995. The Court clarified that Regulation 29 does not apply in this context, reinforcing the principle that pension rights are preserved for employees meeting the service criteria. The appeals by the Bank were dismissed, thereby ensuring the employees receive their entitled pensions.

STATE BANK OF PATIALA vs PRITAM SINGH BEDI . · Niyam