Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-07

ANIL GUPTA vs STAR INDIA PVT.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/32943
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANIL GUPTA
Respondent
STAR INDIA PVT.LTD.
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Bench
V. GOPALA GOWDA SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of limitation under Section 138 and Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, holding that the complaint against the respondent company was barred by limitation due to a prior valid notice. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to quash the summons against the company while upholding the summons against the appellant, establishing that vicarious liability under Section 141 does not exempt an individual from liability if proper notice is served. The outcome was a partial affirmation of the High Court's ruling, with the complaint against the company quashed and the summons against the appellant upheld.

ANIL GUPTA vs STAR INDIA PVT.LTD. · Niyam