Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-23

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY vs ARUN SHOURIE

Citation / case number
SC 1990/77114
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY
Respondent
ARUN SHOURIE
Author
R.M. LODHA
Bench
CHIEF JUSTICE,ANIL R. DAVE,SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,DIPAK MISRA,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the contempt petitions against Arun Shourie for publishing an editorial that criticized the Kuldip Singh Commission's report. The Court emphasized the importance of judicial integrity and the need for accountability among judges, particularly in light of the allegations of misconduct and lack of evidence in the Commission's findings. The Court held that the editorial, while critical, did not amount to contempt as it was a legitimate expression of opinion regarding judicial conduct and the functioning of the Commission.

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY vs ARUN SHOURIE · Niyam