Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-02

Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale vs Dilip Bajrang Kale & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SC (SUPP) 1346
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale
Respondent
Dilip Bajrang Kale & Anr
Bench
R.K. Agrawal, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Bombay High Court's order setting aside the acquittal of the appellant under Section 498A and Section 302 IPC. The Court emphasized the importance of dying declarations, noting that the High Court had re-evaluated the evidence despite the limitations of revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The Court ultimately upheld the High Court's decision to remand the case for fresh consideration, reinforcing the principle that the appreciation of evidence is crucial in determining guilt or innocence.

Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale vs Dilip Bajrang Kale & Anr · Niyam