Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-08

State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra
Respondent
Rajendra & Ors
Bench
V. Gopala Gowda, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the presumption under Section 113-A of the Evidence Act does not apply unless the prosecution establishes that the death was suicidal and that the deceased was subjected to cruelty, requiring direct evidence. The Court found that the High Court erred in acquitting the accused under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 306 IPC, all read with Section 34 IPC, as the evidence presented indicated a prima facie case of dowry-related harassment and death. Consequently, the Supreme Court reversed the High Court's judgment and reinstated the charges against the accused.

State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra & Ors · Niyam