Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-07-02

Rishipal vs State Of U.P. & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rishipal
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Anr
Author
N.V. Ramana
Bench
N.V. Ramana, Ranjana Prakash Desai

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash the proceedings in Complaint Case No. 2397 of 2012 under Sections 34, 379, 411, 417, 418, 420, 457, 458, and 477 IPC. The Court emphasized that the Branch Manager's failure to act on the complainant's notice regarding lost cheques constituted negligence and complicity in the alleged conspiracy to defraud the complainant. The Court held that the allegations warranted further investigation and did not find grounds to quash the complaint.

Rishipal vs State Of U.P. & Anr · Niyam