Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-01-16

KM. HEMA MISHRA vs STATE OF UP .

Citation / case number
SC 2012/34948
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KM. HEMA MISHRA
Respondent
STATE OF UP .
Author
K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN
Bench
A.K. SIKRI K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appellant's challenge against the dismissal of her writ petition by the High Court, which sought to quash an FIR under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to the amended provisions of Section 41(1)(b) and Section 41A of the CrPC regarding the arrest of the appellant until credible evidence is collected. The Court held that the High Court erred in not exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 to protect the appellant's rights, thereby allowing the appeal and directing compliance with the procedural safeguards in the investigation.

KM. HEMA MISHRA vs STATE OF UP . · Niyam