Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-01-10

HARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/1111
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARDEEP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB .
Author
P SATHASIVAM,B.S. CHAUHAN,RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI,RANJAN GOGOI,S.A. BOBDE
Bench
P SATHASIVAM,B.S. CHAUHAN,RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI,RANJAN GOGOI,S.A. BOBDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, concerning the power of courts to add accused persons during inquiry or trial. The Court clarified that the power under Section 319 can be exercised even before the completion of cross-examination of witnesses, provided there is sufficient evidence suggesting that the additional accused are likely to be convicted. The judgment resolves conflicting views from previous cases, specifically distinguishing the rulings in Rakesh v. State of Haryana and Mohd. Shafi v. Mohd. Rafiq, thereby establishing a clearer guideline for lower courts.

HARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB . · Niyam