Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-01-16

Exe.Engr.Road Dev.Division No.Iii & ... vs Atlanta Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1093
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Exe.Engr.Road Dev.Division No.Iii & ...
Respondent
Atlanta Ltd
Author
Jagdish Singh Khehar
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, A.K. Patnaik

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the arbitration proceedings between the State of Maharashtra and Atlanta Limited under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically Section 34. The Court held that the High Court was correct in allowing the transfer of the State's applications challenging the arbitral award to be heard alongside Atlanta Limited's petition, emphasizing the need to avoid conflicting decisions. The ruling reinforced the principle of consolidation of proceedings when parties are common to both matters, thereby ensuring judicial efficiency and coherence in the resolution of disputes.

Exe.Engr.Road Dev.Division No.Iii & ... vs Atlanta Ltd · Niyam