Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-01-10

State Of U.P.Thr.Exe.Engineer & Anr vs Amar Nath Yadav

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SC (SUPP) 1917
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P.Thr.Exe.Engineer & Anr
Respondent
Amar Nath Yadav
Author
A.K. Sikri
Bench
A.K. Sikri, K.S. Radhakrishnan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court denied the condonation of a 481-day delay in filing a Special Leave Petition, emphasizing that the explanation provided by the petitioner, related to bureaucratic delays, was insufficient. The Court reiterated that government departments must provide reasonable and acceptable justifications for delays, as the law of limitation applies equally to all. Citing the precedent in State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Hanuman, the Court dismissed the petition on the grounds of delay, reinforcing the principle that condonation of delay is an exception, not a rule.

State Of U.P.Thr.Exe.Engineer & Anr vs Amar Nath Yadav · Niyam