Supreme Court of India · 2014-02-19
POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM vs TEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA
- Citation / case number
- SC 2011/11435
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Petitioner
- POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM
- Respondent
- TEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA
- Author
- K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN
- Bench
- VIKRAMAJIT SEN K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
Judgment text excerpt
The Supreme Court interpreted Section 37 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956, determining that the valuation of a suit for cancellation of a sale deed must be based on the market value of the property at the time of filing the plaint, rather than the sale consideration stated in the deed. The Court upheld the principle established in previous judgments, including Kolachala Kutumba Sastri v. Lakkaraju Bala Tripura Sundaramma, affirming that the market value is the appropriate basis for court fees in such cases. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling on court fee valuation.