Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-02-19

POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM vs TEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA

Citation / case number
SC 2011/11435
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM
Respondent
TEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA
Author
K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN
Bench
VIKRAMAJIT SEN K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 37 of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956, determining that the valuation of a suit for cancellation of a sale deed must be based on the market value of the property at the time of filing the plaint, rather than the sale consideration stated in the deed. The Court upheld the principle established in previous judgments, including Kolachala Kutumba Sastri v. Lakkaraju Bala Tripura Sundaramma, affirming that the market value is the appropriate basis for court fees in such cases. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling on court fee valuation.

POLAMRASETTI MANIKYAM vs TEEGALA VENKATA RAMAYYA · Niyam