Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-02-11

Suhas H Pophale vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.& Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1509
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Suhas H Pophale
Respondent
Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.& Anr
Bench
J. Chelameswar, H.L. Gokhale

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court rejected Writ Petition No. 2473 of 1996, affirming the applicability of the Public Premises Act in the eviction proceedings against the appellant, who claimed tenancy rights based on a leave and licence agreement with Mr. Eric Voller. The Court held that the appellant's occupation was unauthorized under Section 4 of the Public Premises Act, as the original tenant had not legally transferred tenancy rights. The Court emphasized that the first respondent's actions in terminating the tenancy and seeking eviction were valid and lawful.

Suhas H Pophale vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd.& Anr · Niyam