RAMAN vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LT.

The Supreme Court held that under Section 68 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, and Rule 91 of the Electricity Rules, 1956, electricity providers have a duty to ensure safety measures for overhead lines. The Court found that the respondents failed to take necessary precautions, leading to the appellant's electrocution and subsequent disability. The Court awarded compensation to the appellant, establishing that negligence by the electricity provider was a significant factor in the incident.