Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-18

K.K.SAXENA vs INTERNATIONAL COMMN.IRRI.& DRAING.

Citation / case number
SC 2011/30848
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.K.SAXENA
Respondent
INTERNATIONAL COMMN.IRRI.& DRAING.
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
A.K. SIKRI J. CHELAMESWAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) is not a 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution, thus making the writ petition under Article 226 not maintainable. The Court emphasized that ICID's actions are not subject to judicial review under Article 226, affirming the dismissal of the appellant's appeal and review petition. The judgment clarifies the criteria for determining 'State' status and the applicability of Article 14 regarding arbitrariness in termination of services.

K.K.SAXENA vs INTERNATIONAL COMMN.IRRI.& DRAING. · Niyam