Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-18

B.A.LINGA REDDY ETC.ETC. vs KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTH..

Citation / case number
SC 2011/20457
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.A.LINGA REDDY ETC.ETC.
Respondent
KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTH..
Author
ARUN MISHRA JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
Bench
ARUN MISHRA JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the State Government is not required to assign reasons when modifying schemes under Section 102 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court upheld the modifications made to various transport schemes, including the Bellary Scheme and others, which were previously quashed by the High Court of Karnataka. The judgment clarified that the absence of a requirement for reasons does not violate principles of natural justice in this context, affirming the validity of the modifications made under the Act.

B.A.LINGA REDDY ETC.ETC. vs KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTH.. · Niyam