Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-06

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU .

Citation / case number
SC 2009/33632
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY
Respondent
STATE OF TAMIL NADU .
Author
S.A. BOBDE B.S. CHAUHAN
Bench
S.A. BOBDE B.S. CHAUHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the claims of Podhu Dikshitars to administer the Sri Sabhanayagar Temple, invoking Article 26 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to manage religious affairs. The Court held that the historical rights of the Dikshitars, as a religious denomination, must be respected, and the statutory provisions of The Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951, and the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, cannot infringe upon these rights. The appeals were allowed, affirming the Dikshitars' entitlement to manage the temple's properties.

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU . · Niyam