Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-03

Sushil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr vs Anil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2014 SC 106
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sushil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr
Respondent
Anil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr
Bench
R. Banumathi, Adarsh Kumar Goel, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's dismissal of the appellants' revision petition seeking restoration of possession under Section 151 CPC, affirming that the application was filed belatedly, nearly seven months after the alleged dispossession. The Court noted that the trial had already commenced and the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of forcible dispossession. The Court held that the High Court's decision to appoint a Special Officer for inspection was appropriate and that the appellants were given liberty to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.

Sushil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr vs Anil Kumar Dey Biswas & Anr · Niyam