Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-18

B.A.Linga Reddy Etc.Etc vs Karnataka State Transport Auth.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SUPREME COURT 767
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.A.Linga Reddy Etc.Etc
Respondent
Karnataka State Transport Auth.& Ors
Author
Arun Mishra
Bench
Jagdish Singh Khehar, Arun Mishra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the State Government is required to assign reasons when modifying schemes under Section 102 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the modifications of various transport schemes, including the Bellary Scheme and others, due to the absence of reasoned orders. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of transparency and accountability in administrative actions affecting public transport services.

B.A.Linga Reddy Etc.Etc vs Karnataka State Transport Auth.& Ors · Niyam