Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-17

Raman vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt.& ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 506
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Raman
Respondent
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt.& ...
Author
V.Gopala Gowda
Bench
V. Gopala Gowda, C. Nagappan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 68 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, and Rule 91 of the Electricity Rules, 1956, electricity authorities have a duty to ensure safety measures for overhead electric lines. The Court established the principle of 'strict liability' in cases of electrocution, affirming that negligence on the part of the electricity provider can lead to compensation for victims. The Court overturned the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's claim for compensation due to the negligence of the electricity department, resulting in a ruling in favor of the appellant.

Raman vs Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Lt.& ... · Niyam