Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-12-10

G.M.(Operations) S.B.I. & Anr vs R.Periyasamy

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
G.M.(Operations) S.B.I. & Anr
Respondent
R.Periyasamy
Author
S. A. Bobde
Bench
S.A. Bobde, J. Chelameswar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Madras High Court which set aside the dismissal of the respondent, Periyasamy, from the State Bank of India under Rule 49(h) of the State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules. The Court found that the disciplinary authority's conclusion of misconduct was not supported by sufficient evidence, particularly regarding the alleged currency shortage of Rs. 1,25,000. The Court emphasized the necessity of a fair inquiry and the burden of proof on the employer in disciplinary proceedings.

G.M.(Operations) S.B.I. & Anr vs R.Periyasamy · Niyam