Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-08-01

DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHOD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2007/2066
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHOD
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
T.S. THAKUR,VIKRAMAJIT SEN,C. NAGAPPAN
Bench
T.S. THAKUR,VIKRAMAJIT SEN,C. NAGAPPAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the territorial jurisdiction concerning criminal complaints under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, specifically interpreting Section 138. The Court reiterated that the offence under Section 138 is completed through a series of acts including the drawing, presentation, and dishonor of the cheque, followed by a written notice to the drawer. The Court emphasized the importance of the receipt of the notice for establishing the cause of action, thereby clarifying the procedural requirements for filing complaints under the NI Act.

DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHOD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam