Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-08-27

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. vs DILBAHAR SINGH

Citation / case number
SC 2004/13055
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD.
Respondent
DILBAHAR SINGH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court referred the matter to a 5-Judge Bench to resolve conflicting interpretations of 'legality and propriety' under Section 15(6) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, as seen in Rukmini Amma Saradamma v. Kallyani Sulochana and Ram Dass v. Ishwar Chander. The Court noted that while Rukmini held that revisional courts cannot re-appreciate evidence, Ram Dass allowed for such reappraisal. The Court emphasized the need for a larger bench to clarify this issue, which affects various rent control legislations, including the Kerala and Tamil Nadu Rent Control Acts.

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. vs DILBAHAR SINGH · Niyam