Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-08-29

Ram Bahadur Pandey & Anr vs State Of Uttarkhand & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 1560
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ram Bahadur Pandey & Anr
Respondent
State Of Uttarkhand & Ors
Author
Anil R. Dave
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Anil R. Dave

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the appellants' services as Assistant Teachers was in violation of Rule 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Schools (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers and other Conditions) Rules, 1975, which mandates prior approval from the Basic Shiksha Adhikari for such actions. The Court found that the appellants were entitled to reinstatement as their termination lacked the necessary procedural compliance. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the appellants were directed to be reinstated with back wages.

Ram Bahadur Pandey & Anr vs State Of Uttarkhand & Ors · Niyam