Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-08-13

North Eastern Railway & Ors vs Tripple Engineering Work

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 3506
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
North Eastern Railway & Ors
Respondent
Tripple Engineering Work
Author
Ranjan Gogoi
Bench
M. Y. Eqbal, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appointment of an arbitrator under the General Conditions of Contract, specifically Clauses 64(3)(a)(ii) and (iii), in the context of two terminated contracts. The Court held that the Patna High Court acted within its jurisdiction by appointing a retired Chief Justice as the arbitrator due to the prolonged delay in arbitration proceedings, which had not resulted in an award despite initiation in 1996. The Court emphasized the necessity of resolving disputes expeditiously and upheld the High Court's decision to ensure arbitration was conducted effectively.

North Eastern Railway & Ors vs Tripple Engineering Work · Niyam