Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-09

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, MIHONA vs RAMNATH

Citation / case number
SC 2012/22753
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, MIHONA
Respondent
RAMNATH
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Bench
V. GOPALA GOWDA SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's second appeal, affirming that the suit filed by the respondent was maintainable despite the appellant's claim of non-compliance with Section 319 of the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961. The Court clarified that a notice under Section 319 is not a prerequisite for filing a suit for permanent injunction. The ruling established that the statutory requirement of notice does not apply in cases seeking injunctions against public authorities acting in their official capacity.

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, MIHONA vs RAMNATH · Niyam