Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-25

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NONAVINAKERE POLIC vs SHIVANNA @ TARKARI SHIVANNA

Citation / case number
SC 2011/60554
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NONAVINAKERE POLIC
Respondent
SHIVANNA @ TARKARI SHIVANNA
Author
V. GOPALA GOWDA GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Bench
V. GOPALA GOWDA GYAN SUDHA MISRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the urgent need for procedural reforms in the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) to expedite trials for rape cases under Section 376 IPC. The Court proposed that witness statements, particularly those of victims, should be recorded before a Lady Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and kept in sealed cover for trial purposes, thereby minimizing repeated testimonies and delays. The Court called upon the Union of India to consider these amendments to ensure faster justice delivery in heinous offences like rape.

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NONAVINAKERE POLIC vs SHIVANNA @ TARKARI SHIVANNA · Niyam