Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-22

VASU P. SHETTY vs M/S HOTEL VANDANA PALACE .

Citation / case number
SC 2011/39499
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VASU P. SHETTY
Respondent
M/S HOTEL VANDANA PALACE .
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
A.K. SIKRI SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the mandatory requirements under Rules 8 and 9 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) regarding public notice for auction are not waivable. The Court held that the sale of the property was invalid due to insufficient notice, as the notice period of 30 days was not adhered to, thus setting aside the Division Bench's decision that had previously upheld the sale. The Court emphasized the importance of following statutory provisions to ensure fairness in the auction process.

VASU P. SHETTY vs M/S HOTEL VANDANA PALACE . · Niyam