Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-01

BHARATKUMAR SHANTILAL THAKKAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 2011/39088
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHARATKUMAR SHANTILAL THAKKAR
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT
Author
R.M. LODHA
Bench
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH R.M. LODHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Resolution dated 14.6.2012, which grants three advance increments to judicial officers with higher qualifications, is arbitrary as it sets a cut-off date of 1.11.1999 without a rational basis. The Court emphasized the need to implement the recommendations of the Ist National Judicial Pay Commission, specifically para 8.48, which advocates for rewarding candidates with higher qualifications in law. The Court directed the State of Gujarat to reconsider the implementation of these recommendations in a non-discriminatory manner.

BHARATKUMAR SHANTILAL THAKKAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT · Niyam