Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-11

ANNAPURNA vs MALLIKARJUN

Citation / case number
SC 2010/16344
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANNAPURNA
Respondent
MALLIKARJUN
Author
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
Bench
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH ANIL R. DAVE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Article 127 of the Limitation Act, 1963, an application to set aside a sale under Order XXI Rule 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) must be filed within 60 days from the date of sale. The Court found that the High Court erred in quashing the Executing Court's order and remitting the matter back, as the judgment-debtor failed to make the necessary deposit required by CPC. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and upheld the Executing Court's decision, affirming the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and requirements in execution proceedings.

ANNAPURNA vs MALLIKARJUN · Niyam