SHIV MURAT (D) BY LRS. vs SATYAWATI .

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court, affirming that the appellant's objections under Section 12 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act were rightly dismissed. The Court found that the appellant failed to prove the alleged fraud in the compromise deed, which was attested by an advocate. The Court held that the appellant had adequate opportunity to present his case and that the procedural requirements were met, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.