Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2014

Supreme Court of India · 2014-04-01

Bharatkumar Shantilal Thakkar vs State Of Gujarat & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2015 SC (SUPP) 221
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bharatkumar Shantilal Thakkar
Respondent
State Of Gujarat & Anr
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
Shiva Kirti Singh, R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a writ petition under Article 32, addressed the implementation of para 8.48 of the Ist National Judicial Pay Commission's recommendations regarding advance increments for judicial officers with higher qualifications in law. The Court found the cut-off date of 1.11.1999 for granting three advance increments to be arbitrary and lacking a rational nexus with the objective of rewarding higher qualifications. Consequently, the Court directed that the proposed Rule 7-A, which does not impose a cut-off date, should be considered for implementation, thereby ensuring equitable treatment for all qualified candidates regardless of their joining date.

Bharatkumar Shantilal Thakkar vs State Of Gujarat & Anr · Niyam