State Of Tripura & Ors vs Arabinda Chakraborty & Ors

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court affirming the trial court's decree in favor of the respondent, who sought recognition of his seniority from the date of his initial appointment in 1964 despite a subsequent fresh appointment in 1967. The Court emphasized that the respondent's absence without leave did not negate his initial appointment, and the rejection of his representations for seniority was unjustified. The Court ruled that the respondent's suit was filed within the limitation period, as he had continuously pursued his claims, thereby affirming his right to seniority under the relevant service rules.