Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-09-11

JAINA WINES PVT. LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/28383
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JAINA WINES PVT. LTD.
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA H.L. DATTU
Bench
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA H.L. DATTU

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling that wine manufacturers who collected excise duty as part of the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) must remit this amount to the State Government, as the manufacturers were exempt from excise duty under the Maharashtra Government's notification. The Court emphasized that retaining such collected excise duty would constitute unjust enrichment, referencing the principle established in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India (1997) 5 SCC 536. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

JAINA WINES PVT. LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam