Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-09-13

Ravindra @ Bala Jagariath Patil And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2013 SC 189
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ravindra @ Bala Jagariath Patil And Ors
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Bench
M.Y. Eqbal, H.L. Dattu

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in framing charges under Section 120-B IPC against the appellants, as such charges were not made by the Assistant Sessions Judge. The Court emphasized that the High Court should not have altered the charges without proper basis, thus setting aside the High Court's order and affirming the Assistant Sessions Judge's decision. The judgment clarified the limits of appellate review concerning charge framing under the IPC.

Ravindra @ Bala Jagariath Patil And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam