Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-09-13

Resurgence India vs Election Commission Of India & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 344
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Resurgence India
Respondent
Election Commission Of India & Anr
Author
P.Sathasivam
Bench
P Sathasivam, Ranjana Prakash Desai, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating a writ petition under Article 32, emphasized the necessity for the Election Commission to ensure complete and accurate affidavits from candidates as per the directives in Union of India vs. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) 5 SCC 294 and People’s Union for Civil Liberties (2003) 4 SCC 399. The Court held that the Returning Officers must reject incomplete affidavits to maintain electoral integrity, reinforcing the importance of transparency in elections. The judgment reiterates the obligation of the Election Commission to enforce these requirements effectively.

Resurgence India vs Election Commission Of India & Anr · Niyam