Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-09-19

Nagoor Pichai @ Badusha vs State Tr.Sub-Insp.Of Police

Citation / case number
AIR 2014 SUPREME COURT 1040
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Nagoor Pichai @ Badusha
Respondent
State Tr.Sub-Insp.Of Police
Author
Vikramajit Sen
Bench
Vikramajit Sen, T.S. Thakur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act, 1925, in the context of a petitioner sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC for murder. The Court noted that the petitioner, being 19 years and 8 months old at the time of the offense, did not qualify as an 'adolescent offender' under the Act, which defines such offenders as those between 16 and 21 years of age. The Court held that the lower courts erred in not considering the provisions of the Borstal Schools Act, emphasizing the need for legislative amendment to align the definition of juvenile with contemporary standards.

Nagoor Pichai @ Badusha vs State Tr.Sub-Insp.Of Police · Niyam