Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-10-18

BADSHAH vs SOU. URMILA BADSHAH GODSE & ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2013/90298
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BADSHAH
Respondent
SOU. URMILA BADSHAH GODSE & ANR
Author
A.K.SIKRI
Bench
A.K. SIKRI RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court condoned a delay of 63 days in filing a Special Leave Petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) regarding maintenance. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to award maintenance of Rs.1000/- per month to the wife and Rs.500/- per month to the daughter, affirming that the petitioner was legally married to the respondent and had a duty to provide maintenance. The Court emphasized the importance of providing for dependents under Section 125, Cr.P.C., and dismissed the petitioner's claims of non-cohabitation and denial of paternity.

BADSHAH vs SOU. URMILA BADSHAH GODSE & ANR · Niyam