Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-10-01

ANIL KUMAR vs M.K AIYAPPA

Citation / case number
SC 2013/21482
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ANIL KUMAR
Respondent
M.K AIYAPPA
Author
K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
Bench
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Special Judge cannot refer a private complaint for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without a valid sanction order under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court emphasized that the requirement of sanction is a prerequisite for entertaining complaints against public servants for offenses committed in the discharge of their duties. Consequently, the Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the Special Judge's order and the complaint, reinforcing the necessity of following procedural safeguards in corruption cases.

ANIL KUMAR vs M.K AIYAPPA · Niyam