Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2013

Supreme Court of India · 2013-10-07

HARSHA V. RAI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR THROUGH LRS

Citation / case number
SC 2006/4655
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARSHA V. RAI
Respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR THROUGH LRS
Author
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD
Bench
KURIAN JOSEPH CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to register Bhagirathi Bai as an occupant under Section 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, despite the appellant's claim of ownership. The Court clarified that a tenant can be registered as an occupant if they were cultivating the land personally before the vesting date of March 1, 1974, as per Section 45. The Court found that the tribunal's majority opinion, which recognized the historical agricultural use of the land, was valid, thus affirming the tenant's rights.

HARSHA V. RAI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR THROUGH LRS · Niyam