LEELA SHASHIKANT PURANDARE vs ARVIND VISHU GOVANDE(D) THR. LR .

The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decisions regarding the respondent's entitlement to possession of the suit property, confirming that the appellant was unauthorizedly occupying the property without consent. The Court noted that the appellant's actions constituted a breach of the terms under which she was allowed to use the property, as she engaged in manufacturing activities and made structural changes without permission. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to lease agreements and the legal consequences of unauthorized occupation under property law.